🪷
その
頑張る原動力は
誰のため？
🪷
部活でも
勉強でも・仕事でも
自分のために頑張ることもあれば
大切な誰かのために
頑張ることも
(ღ′◡‵)
🪷
仲間と
喜びを分かち合いたくて？
メダルがほしいと言う後輩に入賞メダルを
あげたくて？我武者羅に
なれる貴方
🪷
レースを終えて
酸欠状態で視界が真っ暗だった
そんな話を聞くとね・・・体験したことのない
未知の世界で怖くなる
けど
🪷
倒れなくて
無事で良かった
(ღ′◡‵)
🪷
仲間がいるから
人と一緒に・繋がっているから
我武者羅になれる✨
素敵だね
🪷
団体戦
だからこそ
出し切った後に
最後まで・フリシボッテ
もう一段ギアを
上げた
🪷
視界が
真っ暗で・・・
ゴール直前数メートルは見えていない
抜かれたかと思った
らしい
🪷
最後まで
出し切って・・・格上の選手に
競り勝った
🪷
メダルがほしい
その後輩の言葉が原動力✨
アンカーは格上の選手が揃う激戦区
仲間に入賞を喜ばれて
競り勝ったと
知った
🪷
仲間に
恵まれて
支えられて
繋いだ✨タスキ
素敵な時間はいつか…
いつかおじさんになる頃には
素敵や思い出になる✨
青春の延長線
永遠に
🪷
🍀
あなたの今日が
素敵な一日になりますように
(*'▽')♪
🍀
✿ ✿ ✿ ✿ ✿ ✿
✿ ご訪問 ✿ くださり ✿
✿ ありがとうございました ✿
✿ (人’ ▽｀)☆ ✿
✿ ✿
✿
コメント
Felt the post had been written without using a single buzzword, and a look at claritydrivenmoves continued that clean vocabulary, content free of jargon and trendy phrases reads better and ages better and this site has clearly committed to a vocabulary that will not feel dated in three years which is impressive editorially.
A piece that respected the reader by not over explaining the obvious, and a look at signalshapessuccess continued that calibrated approach, finding the right level of explanation is one of the harder editorial calls and this site has clearly thought carefully about what readers will already know versus what they need help with consistently.
Will recommend this to a couple of friends who have been asking about this exact topic, and after clarityroute I have even more reason to do so, the kind of site that earns word of mouth rather than chasing it through aggressive marketing or paid placements is always a treat to find online.
Just want to record that this site is entering my regular reading list, and a look at ideasneedexecutionnow confirmed it deserves the spot, my regular reading list is short and well curated and adding to it requires meeting a fairly high quality bar that this site has clearly cleared without much effort apparently.
After reading several posts back to back the consistent voice across them is impressive, and a stop at actionleadsforward continued that voice consistency, sites that maintain a single coherent voice across many pieces by potentially many writers represent serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed the institutional consistency needed for that.